Showing posts with label scratch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label scratch. Show all posts

Saturday, June 9, 2012

Another Disappointment

Everyone — even the most privileged who walk the earth — must have felt it at some time.

That helpless, vulnerable, rug–pulled–out–from–under–your–feet feeling.

That's how I felt when I heard the news that I'll Have Another, the winner of this year's Kentucky Derby and Preakness Stakes, had been scratched from today's Belmont Stakes.

This is the longest drought between Triple Crown winners in thoroughbred racing history. Those of us who enjoy watching horse racing have grown wary of Triple Crowns. Almost no one ever speaks about the possibility after the Kentucky Derby, preferring to wait and see if its winner is more than a flash in the pan — and there have been nearly two dozen of those since 1978.

But there have also been a dozen horses — including I'll Have Another — that won the first two races and came to the Belmont in search of that elusive Triple Crown. The others came up short, either spectacularly so or, more rarely, by narrow margins.

There is a reason why the Belmont is called the test of champions. The first two races are shorter. They were designed with speed horses in mind. But the Belmont is longer. It favors endurance.

It is a rare horse — a Secretariat — that combines both speed and endurance.

I've enjoyed watching the horses run since I was a child. Nearly 40 years ago, I saw my first Triple Crown winner (on TV, not in person), then two more came along in what was (and still is) rapid–fire succession for thoroughbred racing.

And we have had no more since.

We've had plenty of near misses since Affirmed won the 1978 Triple Crown.

Perhaps the most colon–tighteningly, tantalizingly, exasperatingly close near miss of them all was the 2004 Belmont Stakes, in which Birdstone overtook Smarty Jones and denied him the Triple Crown by a single length. Smarty Jones seemed to possess both speed and endurance. It was a real disappointment when he failed.

Most of the time, it is a speed horse that comes to the Belmont and loses — big. And that, in itself, answers the question that follows the exceptional horses that win the first two to the third jewel of the Triple Crown: Is this horse more than a speed horse?

Since 1978, all the two–time winners have had their opportunity to answer that question on the track.

But it will never be answered in the case of I'll Have Another. Instead of making a bid for horse racing immortality this afternoon, he was retired.

There was never going to be a shortage of important sports events today. Earlier, Maria Sharapova won the women's final at the French Open. She is now one of a handful of tennis players who won a career Grand Slam — at least one singles title in each of the four Grand Slam events.

Tonight, the Los Angeles Kings will try to win their first–ever Stanley Cup. And the Miami Heat and the Boston Celtics will play for the right to face Oklahoma City in the NBA finals.

But all that would have been overshadowed by far if I'll Have Another had won the Belmont.

Somebody wins the NBA championship, the Stanley Cup and the women's final of the French Open every year.

But it's been 34 years since a horse won the Triple Crown.

Saturday, May 2, 2009

A Scratch at the Kentucky Derby

Just hours before the horses run in the 135th edition of the Kentucky Derby, early favorite I Want Revenge has been scratched.

So — per my earlier post — my new pick, based mostly on speed figures, is Dunkirk.

It does not appear that I Want Revenge has sustained a serious injury, but apparently there was some concern on the part of his trainer that the weather and the track surface could combine to make things worse.

"We just thought that in the best interests of the horse, we're not going to run," trainer Jeff Mullins told Newsday.

The absence of I Want Revenge shouldn't change Rob Longley's Derby picks in the Edmonton Sun.

Longley wrote that I Want Revenge "[o]vercame all kinds of trouble in his last race and still won. A contender for sure but figures to be overbet." Not anymore. Perhaps in the Preakness two weeks from now.

Longley's choice to win the race? Desert Party, a 15–1 shot whose speed figures haven't impressed me. I wonder if Longley is reacting to the recent trend of Derby winners coming from outside post positions, including Big Brown last year from the Post 20 position. Desert Party has the Post 19 position in this year's race. "Outside post won't hurt as it will allow him to get position to effectively use his tactical speed," Longley writes.

His second pick is Friesan Fire ("He is bred for the distance, worked spectacularly over the track here and was brilliant in winning the Louisiana Derby."), his third choice is Dunkirk ("He will be great one day, but perhaps not yet.") and his fourth selection is 30–1 shot Regal Ransom ("Should be a factor on the front end but if the pace is too hot he could be cooked by the time the field hits mid–stretch.")

Someday, I would like to go to the Kentucky Derby. The weather seems about right today — upper 50s, slight chance of isolated showers.

I'm not a devoted horse racing fan, but I do take issue with Jaime Samuelson's blog post in the Detroit Free–Press contending that the Kentucky Derby's claim to be the "most exciting two minutes in sports" is overrated.

And I agree with one of his readers, who commented that Samuelson apparently has never been to the backstretch of any race track — and offered to take him. "It will change your view on the sport," the reader wrote.

I agree with that because I was a casual observer myself when I started working on the sports copy desk of the Arkansas Gazette, but I got to know the horse racing writer and visited Oaklawn Park in Hot Springs on many occasions.

There really is nothing like it. Thoroughbred horses are majestic creatures to watch. When you watch these noble beasts get into position and then burst into the race, you understand why horse racing is considered the sport of kings.

And racing reminds me, in a way, of something a hockey fan once told me. He said that seeing a hockey game in person was entirely different from seeing it on TV. Horse racing is like that. The TV experience cannot compare with watching a race from the rail of a track. The atmosphere is unique.

If you're lucky enough to be in Kentucky this afternoon, I hope you enjoy the experience.